Santa Barbara, Calif. – Today, the Palm Center released a new legal analysis prepared by Legal Co-Director and Law Professor Diane Mazur suggesting that the White House has a strong foundation for not filing an appeal to the recent case which declared “don’t ask, don’t tell” unconstitutional, Log Cabin Republicans v. United States.
The memo concludes: “The Department of Justice has discretion to decline appeal of Judge Phillips’s September 9, 2010 Memorandum Opinion in Log Cabin Republicans v. United States holding ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ unconstitutional. No mandatory duty or obligation requires the government to appeal.”
“When Congress debated ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ in 1993, the constitutional landscape was different than it is today,” stated Professor Mazur, adding: “In 2003, the Supreme Court held in Lawrence v. Texas that the Constitution protects the liberty of all persons, straight and gay, to choose their personal relationships without interference from the government, unless the government has a good reason. In the Log Cabin Republicans case, the government was unable to produce any such reason. Judge Phillips recognized that ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ can no longer be justified under current constitutional doctrine, and President Obama is not required to argue otherwise. He need not defend laws that are based on old, discredited constitutional assumptions.”
This analysis comes one day after a Senate vote failed to override a filibuster on a motion to proceed to consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act of FY2011. The vote failed due to the inclusion of language within the bill to conditionally repeal the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law. “Professor Mazur’s analysis delivers the final argument on whether the White House has the option to let Judge Phillips’ ruling on ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ stand,” stated Christopher Neff, Deputy Executive Director of the Palm Center. He added: “The answer is clear: the Obama Administration can end ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ by not appealing this ruling.”